Godínez by Lazaro Gonzalez Giraldo *
has tried to give scientific explanations, philosophical, political, religious and multiple nature to explain the origin of life. Despite the controversy, all or almost all agree on the marvelous, mysterious and wondrous of it, what helps is valued as the main property of the individual.
Legal matters, what distinguishes one country from another is precisely the concept we have about the person, as in countries where men and gender is more important, ruled by democracies with a proper rule of law, where the guiding principle of the law is the supreme protection of person and human life. This does not mean that there are more or less democratic countries-politically speaking-where life is respected, but as a rule, there is a correlation between democracy, the person and the right to life as well innate and sacred. Therefore, the death penalty is the deprivation of life of the convicted for committing a serious crime punishable by law the death penalty. It also called capital punishment.
writers and philosophers of the eighteenth century, as Montesquieu, Voltaire and Cesare Beccaria (the Marquis) called for major reforms in the penal systems, which were being gradually from limiting the punishable offenses capital punishment until its complete abolition in many legislations. During the nineteenth century emphasized the social aspect of criminal activity, and studied the free will of the offender, noting that it was possible to modify their behavior through education and living conditions. These studies paved the way for studies on the rehabilitation of punishment and rehabilitation of offenders. For its part, the abolition of capital punishment (death penalty) in many countries caused the abandonment of value "magic" of punishment, and even awareness of the offender is still one of the goals of imprisonment, it is first purpose to be effective in the social.
Today, many countries allow the death penalty only in exceptional cases, as in wartime and in situations of extreme gravity. The U.S. has the death penalty in some states, after a ruling by the Supreme Court ruled against the same grounds it was unconstitutional, but, unfortunately, in those states of the American Union which authorizes such a procedure is applied so frequently than would seem that is a phenomenon across the country. Other decisions of the highest court of the United States has sustained its adaptation to changing the Constitution.
In Spain, the death penalty was abolished by the 1978 Constitution, as in the entire European Union.
Proponents of capital punishment argue in their favor exemplary character, which, as interpreted, is not achieved with imprisonment. Those opposed to the application of the death penalty argue just the opposite, adding as an argument the possibility of judicial error regrettable that never shall be free (it would always be impossible to remedy), and the helplessness of those inmates , having no financial resources, could not afford an effective defense at trial, or simply that the defense has been erroneous or misleading. But above all things, is a terminal penalty, which admits no possibility of amendments.
considerations are primarily ethical and religious to the most weight at the time to advocate for the abolition of the death penalty, considering the right to life as sacred and unquestionable.
dictatorships or regimes with democratic appearance have remained in their death penalty laws, among other things for a mechanism of coercion and force to appease the disgruntled crowd.
There are countries where governing exceptions to their application, so we see that does not apply
• With based on assumptions;
° at women
· At over sixty years
· A political prisoners and common crimes related to political, and
· A criminals whose extradition has been granted under that condition.
against the ruling that imposes the death penalty will be permitted all legal remedies, including the appeal, it will always be accepted for processing. The penalty will be executed after exhausting all resources. The Congress may abolish the death penalty.
Those who defend the right to life, believe in the sanctity of it. Consequently, there should be established, rule or applied in any case the death penalty or torture, or other degrading punishment or procedure involving the loss or decline physical integrity or health of the individual. In no case should be allowed to serve prison for violating the dignity of the person, but rather should ensure that the criminal trial and to pursue his rehabilitation, fitness to work and prophylaxis of crime, and protect society from possible beaten by people who threaten the common good.
The right to life is inherent in human beings. It must ensure protection in general from conception, should be abolished the death penalty in any legislation. Everyone should be protected by the state in its physical and mental integrity, as well as in his honor and reputation; without prejudice to other rights necessary for full moral and material derived from the nature of the individual.
Our country has a long history with this type of sanction in positive law. It said it was exceptional and should only be applied in the most serious offenses for which it is established. You can not apply to persons under twenty years, or women who committed the crime while pregnant, or are in the time of sentencing. Is executed by firing squad. However, the mere fact that there is the possibility of imposing such sanctions means that there are definite interplay with human life as leverage and coercion by the authorities. This catalog as a lawyer as an embarrassment to the Cuban justice system and lawyers involved in it. There are other ways, other faults under our law that could be alternatives to this shameful and lamentable failure as shameful and regrettable failures are all imposing the death penalty in response to violations of the Act
One of the most great mistakes of man is to believe God, and although we are made in His image and are the temple of the Holy Spirit, why not have the right to decide on our own lives, let alone on others. That flourish culture of life, to cease and the culture of death in which not a few Sometimes we educate, train and live our lives! This is the goal and the way we should go Cubans
* Godínez Lázaro González Giraldo (Guane, province of Pinar del Rio, 1964): Bachelor's degree in Law at the University of Havana ( 1988). Current member Agramontista. Practiced law in lawyers' Vueltabajo the capital for years, until his unjust expulsion following a judicial hoax. Earlier, another similar attempt to ban arbitrary practice led to the submission to the National Organization of Collective Law in a document Current support Agramontista, signed by dozens of lawyers in business. He served as General Counsel of the Civic Consulting Center for Civic and Religious Pinar del Rio. Resides in the city of Pinar del Río.
has tried to give scientific explanations, philosophical, political, religious and multiple nature to explain the origin of life. Despite the controversy, all or almost all agree on the marvelous, mysterious and wondrous of it, what helps is valued as the main property of the individual. Legal matters, what distinguishes one country from another is precisely the concept we have about the person, as in countries where men and gender is more important, ruled by democracies with a proper rule of law, where the guiding principle of the law is the supreme protection of person and human life. This does not mean that there are more or less democratic countries-politically speaking-where life is respected, but as a rule, there is a correlation between democracy, the person and the right to life as well innate and sacred. Therefore, the death penalty is the deprivation of life of the convicted for committing a serious crime punishable by law the death penalty. It also called capital punishment.
writers and philosophers of the eighteenth century, as Montesquieu, Voltaire and Cesare Beccaria (the Marquis) called for major reforms in the penal systems, which were being gradually from limiting the punishable offenses capital punishment until its complete abolition in many legislations. During the nineteenth century emphasized the social aspect of criminal activity, and studied the free will of the offender, noting that it was possible to modify their behavior through education and living conditions. These studies paved the way for studies on the rehabilitation of punishment and rehabilitation of offenders. For its part, the abolition of capital punishment (death penalty) in many countries caused the abandonment of value "magic" of punishment, and even awareness of the offender is still one of the goals of imprisonment, it is first purpose to be effective in the social.
Today, many countries allow the death penalty only in exceptional cases, as in wartime and in situations of extreme gravity. The U.S. has the death penalty in some states, after a ruling by the Supreme Court ruled against the same grounds it was unconstitutional, but, unfortunately, in those states of the American Union which authorizes such a procedure is applied so frequently than would seem that is a phenomenon across the country. Other decisions of the highest court of the United States has sustained its adaptation to changing the Constitution.
In Spain, the death penalty was abolished by the 1978 Constitution, as in the entire European Union.
Proponents of capital punishment argue in their favor exemplary character, which, as interpreted, is not achieved with imprisonment. Those opposed to the application of the death penalty argue just the opposite, adding as an argument the possibility of judicial error regrettable that never shall be free (it would always be impossible to remedy), and the helplessness of those inmates , having no financial resources, could not afford an effective defense at trial, or simply that the defense has been erroneous or misleading. But above all things, is a terminal penalty, which admits no possibility of amendments.
considerations are primarily ethical and religious to the most weight at the time to advocate for the abolition of the death penalty, considering the right to life as sacred and unquestionable.
dictatorships or regimes with democratic appearance have remained in their death penalty laws, among other things for a mechanism of coercion and force to appease the disgruntled crowd.
There are countries where governing exceptions to their application, so we see that does not apply
• With based on assumptions;
° at women
· At over sixty years
· A political prisoners and common crimes related to political, and
· A criminals whose extradition has been granted under that condition.
against the ruling that imposes the death penalty will be permitted all legal remedies, including the appeal, it will always be accepted for processing. The penalty will be executed after exhausting all resources. The Congress may abolish the death penalty.
Those who defend the right to life, believe in the sanctity of it. Consequently, there should be established, rule or applied in any case the death penalty or torture, or other degrading punishment or procedure involving the loss or decline physical integrity or health of the individual. In no case should be allowed to serve prison for violating the dignity of the person, but rather should ensure that the criminal trial and to pursue his rehabilitation, fitness to work and prophylaxis of crime, and protect society from possible beaten by people who threaten the common good.
The right to life is inherent in human beings. It must ensure protection in general from conception, should be abolished the death penalty in any legislation. Everyone should be protected by the state in its physical and mental integrity, as well as in his honor and reputation; without prejudice to other rights necessary for full moral and material derived from the nature of the individual.
Our country has a long history with this type of sanction in positive law. It said it was exceptional and should only be applied in the most serious offenses for which it is established. You can not apply to persons under twenty years, or women who committed the crime while pregnant, or are in the time of sentencing. Is executed by firing squad. However, the mere fact that there is the possibility of imposing such sanctions means that there are definite interplay with human life as leverage and coercion by the authorities. This catalog as a lawyer as an embarrassment to the Cuban justice system and lawyers involved in it. There are other ways, other faults under our law that could be alternatives to this shameful and lamentable failure as shameful and regrettable failures are all imposing the death penalty in response to violations of the Act
One of the most great mistakes of man is to believe God, and although we are made in His image and are the temple of the Holy Spirit, why not have the right to decide on our own lives, let alone on others. That flourish culture of life, to cease and the culture of death in which not a few Sometimes we educate, train and live our lives! This is the goal and the way we should go Cubans
* Godínez Lázaro González Giraldo (Guane, province of Pinar del Rio, 1964): Bachelor's degree in Law at the University of Havana ( 1988). Current member Agramontista. Practiced law in lawyers' Vueltabajo the capital for years, until his unjust expulsion following a judicial hoax. Earlier, another similar attempt to ban arbitrary practice led to the submission to the National Organization of Collective Law in a document Current support Agramontista, signed by dozens of lawyers in business. He served as General Counsel of the Civic Consulting Center for Civic and Religious Pinar del Rio. Resides in the city of Pinar del Río.
0 comments:
Post a Comment