by Juan Carlos González Leiva *
Before writing these notes I was afraid of not knowing how to explain, but the imprisonment of thousands of young people my country filled me with courage to say that thousands of girls and boys are detained without having committed crimes.
In Cuba, the dangerous state is "the special proclivity that is a person to commit crimes demonstrated by conduct that is contrary manifested by the rules of socialist morality. " This atypical includes habitual drunkenness, dipsomania, drug addiction and antisocial behavior.
organs of State Security and National Police applied more regularly subsection c) of paragraph one of Article 73 of the Penal Code (the "antisocial behavior"). Naturally, we can not get here in legal treatises, because I lost in a sea theorist who would blind the minds of readers and negate the intent to reveal the practical result of the implementation of this regulation in our country.
In one of its parts, unlawful rule stripe in ductility, making it an uncertain bag that allows law enforcement agencies indiscriminately imprisoned, this is the most straightforward denial of the crime as a criminal behavior and theory. The above regulation states: "other provocative acts."
should be noted, first and foremost, that Marxism-Leninism sees any law as a political measure, and the law as a tool for those in power. The Dangerous State is essentially an instrument of political repression by the Cuban government and an attempt to take their acts of domination with particles of legal formalism. This is clearly demonstrated when a dissident is jailed for conduct peaceful supposedly dangerous to society, and in no case shall apply this law or any who star in the violent acts of repudiation and public disorder flagrant break down the doors of homes of independent journalists and activists penetrate into them, practice records, beat their inhabitants and take their property.
In recent months, the dangerous state has become the most popular method used by the Cuban government to imprison independent journalists and human rights activists. Anyone can answer the following questions: Who (or whom) they were a danger for journalists independent imprisoned on this behavior? What social damage means the act of Raymundo Perdigon Brito founded the Independent Press Agency Yayabo Press, for which he was sentenced to four years imprisonment in a summary way in the Popular Municipal Tribunal in Sancti Spiritus, who sent him to the horrific prison Nieves Morejon? Why was jailed independent journalist Oscar Sanchez Madan José or why Ramón Velásquez Toranzo becomes a danger by walking alone along the central highway of his wife and daughter, and had to be sentenced to three years in prison, which extinguishes in a labor camp? Among
the victims of this legal monstrosity are also independent librarians José Antonio Mola Porro and Eduardo González Vázquez, as well as human rights activists and Loyola Raúl Hernández Quiñones Roberto Velasco, all of the city of Camagüey. In addition, Yancy Ruiz Martínez, Osvaldo Ras de la Cruz, Hugo Blanco Prieto, Lazaro Rosales Rojas, Ernesto Rodríguez Hernández, José Antonio Martínez Gallardo, Emilio Santos Oviedo et al. The Cuban government also imprisoned María de los Ángeles Borrego Mir, the only woman listed as dangerous dissident.
peaceful dissidents are expelled from their centers work and harassed to the point of destroying their nervous system and family, and then taken to jail, accused of habitual vagrants and parasites of society.
Heads of sectors of the national police are the spearhead of this method of social repression, they make the official warnings and records predeclictiva social dangerousness, which in most cases are full of slanderous lies. They become a social scourge, a judge Inquisitor at its discretion determines who has become "dangerous." (Of course, I mean the case of the dangerous political not because they are unique to the State Security.)
I can not dejar de mencionar que el gobierno castiga la prostitución, conocida en Cuba como jineterismo, encarcelando a las muchachas bajo el Estado Peligroso, condenándolas hasta a cuatro años de privación de libertad en campamentos de trabajos forzados. En la generalidad de los casos, los juicios son sumarios y sin las más mínimas garantías procesales; el recientísimo enjuiciamiento del periodista independiente Oscar Sánchez Madan deja muy claro este actuar: fue arrestado el viernes 13 de abril alrededor de las siete de la mañana, y condenado cuatro horas después, sin que mediara ninguna formalidad anterior y sin la participación de sus familiares ni amigos.
La amplia utilización que tiene hoy en Cuba State legal aberration Dangerous, I consider the law from a Marxist-Leninist, as Caribbean. It is true that in some countries the law has regulated the dangerous state and that the eminent Jiménez de Azua defended criminal social dangerousness. But I understand that society has no need to "protect" this rule undermines the entire criminal justice system and its institutions, and that destroys the individual, homeless, and turning against the society that establishes it.
The mentally ill, alcoholics, drug addicts and others, are requiring medical care facilities should not be regulated for criminal science, before remain as an obligation of the State in terms of health and public safety. It is an outright denial of the right to punish a patient unable to understand the scope of their actions, and a felony in a prison for aggravated his health and destroy criminal fashion.
Such is the contradiction of the State Hazardous to criminal science and human rights in general, at odds even with the "Socialist Constitution." Article 69 states: "No one can be tried or sentenced except by the competent court under laws preceding the commission of the offense and with the formalities and guarantees that they establish."
In my opinion, the crime is lurking in the minds and hearts of every human being, and every individual is prone to commit. Only God can know how much humans are coming up to carry out a criminal act.
What part of the path of crime advocates can locate dangerous state? What ideation, deliberation, decision or execution? If the social dangers no action or omission harmful and classified, what is the foundation of the security measure?
Before writing these notes I was afraid of not knowing how to explain, but the imprisonment of thousands of young people my country filled me with courage to say that thousands of girls and boys are detained without having committed crimes. In Cuba, the dangerous state is "the special proclivity that is a person to commit crimes demonstrated by conduct that is contrary manifested by the rules of socialist morality. " This atypical includes habitual drunkenness, dipsomania, drug addiction and antisocial behavior.
organs of State Security and National Police applied more regularly subsection c) of paragraph one of Article 73 of the Penal Code (the "antisocial behavior"). Naturally, we can not get here in legal treatises, because I lost in a sea theorist who would blind the minds of readers and negate the intent to reveal the practical result of the implementation of this regulation in our country.
In one of its parts, unlawful rule stripe in ductility, making it an uncertain bag that allows law enforcement agencies indiscriminately imprisoned, this is the most straightforward denial of the crime as a criminal behavior and theory. The above regulation states: "other provocative acts."
should be noted, first and foremost, that Marxism-Leninism sees any law as a political measure, and the law as a tool for those in power. The Dangerous State is essentially an instrument of political repression by the Cuban government and an attempt to take their acts of domination with particles of legal formalism. This is clearly demonstrated when a dissident is jailed for conduct peaceful supposedly dangerous to society, and in no case shall apply this law or any who star in the violent acts of repudiation and public disorder flagrant break down the doors of homes of independent journalists and activists penetrate into them, practice records, beat their inhabitants and take their property.
In recent months, the dangerous state has become the most popular method used by the Cuban government to imprison independent journalists and human rights activists. Anyone can answer the following questions: Who (or whom) they were a danger for journalists independent imprisoned on this behavior? What social damage means the act of Raymundo Perdigon Brito founded the Independent Press Agency Yayabo Press, for which he was sentenced to four years imprisonment in a summary way in the Popular Municipal Tribunal in Sancti Spiritus, who sent him to the horrific prison Nieves Morejon? Why was jailed independent journalist Oscar Sanchez Madan José or why Ramón Velásquez Toranzo becomes a danger by walking alone along the central highway of his wife and daughter, and had to be sentenced to three years in prison, which extinguishes in a labor camp? Among
the victims of this legal monstrosity are also independent librarians José Antonio Mola Porro and Eduardo González Vázquez, as well as human rights activists and Loyola Raúl Hernández Quiñones Roberto Velasco, all of the city of Camagüey. In addition, Yancy Ruiz Martínez, Osvaldo Ras de la Cruz, Hugo Blanco Prieto, Lazaro Rosales Rojas, Ernesto Rodríguez Hernández, José Antonio Martínez Gallardo, Emilio Santos Oviedo et al. The Cuban government also imprisoned María de los Ángeles Borrego Mir, the only woman listed as dangerous dissident.
peaceful dissidents are expelled from their centers work and harassed to the point of destroying their nervous system and family, and then taken to jail, accused of habitual vagrants and parasites of society.
Heads of sectors of the national police are the spearhead of this method of social repression, they make the official warnings and records predeclictiva social dangerousness, which in most cases are full of slanderous lies. They become a social scourge, a judge Inquisitor at its discretion determines who has become "dangerous." (Of course, I mean the case of the dangerous political not because they are unique to the State Security.)
I can not dejar de mencionar que el gobierno castiga la prostitución, conocida en Cuba como jineterismo, encarcelando a las muchachas bajo el Estado Peligroso, condenándolas hasta a cuatro años de privación de libertad en campamentos de trabajos forzados. En la generalidad de los casos, los juicios son sumarios y sin las más mínimas garantías procesales; el recientísimo enjuiciamiento del periodista independiente Oscar Sánchez Madan deja muy claro este actuar: fue arrestado el viernes 13 de abril alrededor de las siete de la mañana, y condenado cuatro horas después, sin que mediara ninguna formalidad anterior y sin la participación de sus familiares ni amigos.
La amplia utilización que tiene hoy en Cuba State legal aberration Dangerous, I consider the law from a Marxist-Leninist, as Caribbean. It is true that in some countries the law has regulated the dangerous state and that the eminent Jiménez de Azua defended criminal social dangerousness. But I understand that society has no need to "protect" this rule undermines the entire criminal justice system and its institutions, and that destroys the individual, homeless, and turning against the society that establishes it.
The mentally ill, alcoholics, drug addicts and others, are requiring medical care facilities should not be regulated for criminal science, before remain as an obligation of the State in terms of health and public safety. It is an outright denial of the right to punish a patient unable to understand the scope of their actions, and a felony in a prison for aggravated his health and destroy criminal fashion.
Such is the contradiction of the State Hazardous to criminal science and human rights in general, at odds even with the "Socialist Constitution." Article 69 states: "No one can be tried or sentenced except by the competent court under laws preceding the commission of the offense and with the formalities and guarantees that they establish."
In my opinion, the crime is lurking in the minds and hearts of every human being, and every individual is prone to commit. Only God can know how much humans are coming up to carry out a criminal act.
What part of the path of crime advocates can locate dangerous state? What ideation, deliberation, decision or execution? If the social dangers no action or omission harmful and classified, what is the foundation of the security measure?
* Juan Carlos González Leiva: Avileño. Blind. From the day of his graduation as Bachelor of Laws (University of Havana, 1997) joined the current Agramontista. President of the Cuban Foundation for Human Rights and Executive Secretary of the Council of Human Rights Rapporteurs (both organizations based in Ciego de Avila). Is the only former political prisoner in the world blind. Lies in Ciego de Avila.
0 comments:
Post a Comment