Our Constitution in Article 257, states that the process will be brief, so this rule has been implemented in all procedural rules, specifically in the Criminal Procedure Code, in the periods that have been established the representative of the Public Ministry for investigation, where people are judged in freedom, in Articles 313 and 314 of the penal adjective rule as follows: "Article 313. Duration. The Public Prosecutor will seek to terminate the preparatory phase with the diligence required by the case. Six months after the identification of the accused, the judge may require the control to set a reasonable period of not less than thirty days nor more than one hundred twenty days for the conclusion of the investigation. Fixing this period, the judge shall hear the Public Prosecutor and the person and take into account the magnitude the damage caused, the complexity of the investigation, and any other circumstances which it considers can reach the goal of the process. Excluded from the application of this rule, the causes that relate to the investigation of crimes against humanity, against the public interest in human rights, war crimes, drug trafficking and related crimes. "" Section 314. Extension. Once the deadline, according to the above article, the Attorney General may request an extension. Losing it, within thirty days thereafter, shall file charges or seek dismissal. The decision to deny the extension solicitada por el Fiscal podrá ser apelada. Si vencidos los plazos que le hubieren sido fijados, el Fiscal del Ministerio Público no presentare acusación ni solicitare sobreseimiento de la causa, el Juez decretará el archivo de las actuaciones, el cual comporta el cese inmediato de todas las medida de coerción personal, cautelares y de aseguramiento impuestas y la condición de imputado. La investigación sólo podrá ser reabierta cuando surjan nuevos elementos que lo justifiquen, previa autorización del Juez” Ahora bien, la Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela establece en el artículo 257 que el proceso constituye un instrumento fundamental para la realización de la justicia, y que las procedural laws "... provide for the simplification, uniformity and efficiency of procedures and take a brief procedure, oral and public ..." consecrating, in turn, Article 26, the guarantee of Justice "... free, accessible, impartial, appropriate , transparent, autonomous, independent, responsible, equitable and expeditious, without undue delay ... ", therefore these constitutional phrases denote the earliest and the necessary and reasonable time limit on any process, which is reaffirmed with the express that the civil right to due process is done in Article 49 paragraph 3 of the Basic Text, rule reads: "... Everyone has the right to be heard in any kind of process, with due guarantees and within a reasonable time specified by law, by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established before ...", resulting from special connotation and attention from operators of Justice, the notions of undue delay, within reasonable short process and fair trial. Therefore, the state assumes the duty to realize the fundamental right of every person to a short process, fair and without undue delay, right can be exercised and required in legal terms, and that is also legal hold instruments international, eg, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 14, paragraph 3, paragraph c: "... every person accused of a crime shall have the right ... to be tried without undue delay ...") and the American Convention on Human Rights ( Article 8, paragraph 1 "... everyone is entitled to a hearing with due guarantees and within a reasonable time ..."). Dr. HENRY ANDREA
0 comments:
Post a Comment